|
Written by Erika Fredrickson
|
|
Friday, 13 February 2009 |
|

The number of farms in India is decreasing while the number of farmer suicides increases. Between 1997 and 2007 it's reported that 182,936 Indian farmers killed themselves over debt-related issues. The actual number is probably higher because women aren't considered farmers in this kind of data-collection (they rarely get land in their name) yet they often are primary farmers. So any women suicides are deemed “suicide” but not “farmer suicide.”
This is the largest sustained wave of suicides in historical record. The way the stats break down is that ever since 2001, a farmer has committed suicide every 30 minutes on average in India. Peasant farming debt has doubled since the first decade of neo-liberalism “economic reforms.”
The suicides are highest among cash crop farmers, especially those who grow vanilla, groundnut, sugarcane, coffee, pepper and cotton. Giant seed companies have displaced cheap hybrid seeds and traditional seeds. When these farmers switch to GM crops, the crops often get attacked by pests and also need double the water. Farmers have to invest in pesticides: something they were told would not be needed. Their crops often fail, and they find themselves in huge debt. Hunger among farmers is skyrocketing. Healthcare costs make it worse. Many farmers have to work on other people's farms to make a living. And as government subsidies keep Western farmers strong on the international market, the Indian farmers can't compete. Many of them kill themselves by drinking the pesticides they thought they wouldn't need.
In Ghana, there's also been a suicide wave, but here it's among small-scale tomato growers. The importation of tomato paste on the international market makes these farmers tomatoes difficult to sell because people are buying the paste instead of local tomatoes. Lack of refrigeration options leaves tomatoes to rot. And the farmers find themselves harassed by creditors at which point they see suicide as their final option.
Sources: Outlook India, Aftermath News, All Africa, Counterpunch |
|
|
Written by Kiki Hubbard
|
|
Monday, 09 February 2009 |
|

"Better Yo-Late than Yo-Never." That's what Stonyfield Farm's CEO is saying about Yoplait's announcement to go completely rBGH-free by August.
A subsidiary of General Mills, Yoplait is one of the largest dairy processors in the U.S. The Organic Consumers Association reports that Yoplait is calling itself the "first leading brand of yogurt to utilize milk that is 100% certified from cows not treated with rBST/rBGH."
Stonyfield might disagree with that statement, as it was the first major dairy company in the U.S. to pay milk suppliers not to use artificial hormones. Now the company touts the number three position in yogurt sales and is the top-seller of organic yogurt. In other words, the no-hormone trend is real and has paid off for companies that banned the controversial hormone early on in the debate. Since the engineered hormone hit the scene in 1994, dozens of major brands have joined the "rBGH-free" wagon, and last year, foreseeing a dry future for the milk hormone, Monsanto sold rBGH to a pharmaceutical company.
Consumer pressure no doubt had an impact on General Mills' recent decision. In 2007, Breast Cancer Action launched an online campaign asking consumers to "Tell Yoplait: Put a Lid on rBGH" (a "pinkwashing" of General Mills' pink lid campaign to raise money for Susan G. Komen for the Cure).
Sources: PR Newswire, Business Journal |
|
|
Written by Kiki Hubbard
|
|
Friday, 06 February 2009 |
|

We admit that leftover food scraps isn't the most sexy Envirovore topic. But, hey, think of it from a conservation perspective.
While some businesses have gotten creative with their food waste by turning it into another product, or at least compost, others, like this New York sushi restaurant is adding a bit extra to the tab. You know, as a reminder that wasting food isn't okay. Cutting food waste makes economical sense, it cuts costs. Simply put, less food waste means more money in someone's pocketbook.
If you have any doubt, check out a campaign in the UK called "Love Food, Hate Waste," a resource for why cutting food waste matters, what top chefs do with leftovers, and how to save time and money with cooking.
To remind you, we waste a ton of food in this country. EPA estimates that 12% of municipal solid waste (30 million tons) is food scraps. This is enough to feed the entire population of Canada, according to Bob Lilienfeld, co-author of Use Less Stuff, who also provides 10 easy ways to be cognitive of our food waste and how to reduce it after the jump. Think of the landfills, your pocketbook, and the people who don't have the choice, and eat up. |
|
|
Written by Kiki Hubbard
|
|
Wednesday, 04 February 2009 |
|

Public Radio's Living on Earth recently tackled the controversial topic of "Golden Rice," a genetically engineered variety that produces Vitamin A. Questions remain as to whether it's culturally appropriate to give yellow (versus white) rice to the targeted populations and if the rice even provides enough Vitamin A. While Syngenta says it will give the rice away for free, it's keeping its patents.
In other rice news, Greenpeace is calling for measures to protect Thailand's rice supply from GMO contamination to avoid a repeat of the expensive U.S. rice contamination event in 2006. This follows an announcement that Thailand won a Guinness World Record for exporting the most rice in 2007.
South Korea says it won't import transgenic corn this year, partly because its citizens shun GMOs. And The Korea Times reports that civic groups are calling for tougher rules on labeling guidelines for transgenic material in food.
The Native Hawaiian Caucus is pushing a bill that seeks to prohibit the development, testing, and release (including planting and importation) of genetically engineered taro. In September 2008, Hawaii County moved to ban transgenic taro and coffee.
Hungary is defying the European Commission's call to lift bans on GMOs. The country says it will keep a ban on GE corn imports and plantings in place.
And, conversely, a farmer has defied Wales' ban on GMO crops after planting transgenic corn last year. He explains why he did it here.
Pakistan has chosen to embrace GMOs by signing a $1 billion agreement with Monsanto for its Bt cotton. In response, Pakistan's Department of Environmental Sciences has initiated a project to study the environmental impacts of GMOs.
Italy's Agricultural Minister says GE crops aren't the solution to the hunger crisis. Italy will host the first summit of agriculture ministers from G-8 countries in April.
Top chefs are calling on Obama to strengthen U.S. food policy and some are asking that GMO ingredients be labeled. Now that's change we can believe in. |
|
|
Written by Heather McKee
|
|
Tuesday, 03 February 2009 |
|

For over fifty years, the fruit fly and other produce pests have been controlled with not only pesticides, but sterile males. The sterile male thing works like this: Males of the pest species are irradiated in a laboratory and released, in hopes that they will be sexy enough to outcompete fertile males, rendering female fruit fly eggs infertile, and breaking the cycle of outbreak.
Unsurprisingly, irradiated flies aren't so good at anything, including being sexy and outcompeting healthy fruit flies. In fact, scientists have to release 100 sterile males for every 1 wild, virile male in order to make an impact on fruit fly populations.
But German scientists have found a way to control a male's sterility without irradiation - by engineering fruit fly genomes to direct embryonic suicide. Apparently, the Medfly (we're assuming a big fat patent here) is 10 times "sexier" than an irradiated male to female fruit flies.
Of course, research into more efficient non-toxic pest control methods is great, but genetic engineering even of this sort still begs discussion of the ethics of ownership of life, as well as ecological discussions of snowballing impacts of genetically engineered organisms being released into the wild.
Via Science |
|
|
Written by Heather McKee
|
|
Monday, 02 February 2009 |
|

In the late 1940s, producers discovered that chickens fed the pharmaceutical byproducts of the antibiotic tetracycline grew faster than other chickens. Since then, producers have rampantly mass-medicated livestock to allow for overcrowding and to increase growth rates. Over 25 million pounds of antibiotics are used in livestock production in the United States annually.
Of course, we've been ingesting some of those antibiotics too, by drinking and eating the milk and meat from these animals. What we didn't realize is that we may have also been ingesting those antibiotics in our vegetables.
A new University of Minnesota study shows that vegetable crops fertilized with manure from medicated animals absorb the antibiotics right along with the nutrients. In the leaves of green onion, cabbage, and corn crops treated with manure, the livestock antibiotics chlortetracycline and sulfamethazine appeared.
The antibiotics appeared at far less than prescription dosages, and the heavy processing of some vegetables (like corn) may break down some of the antibiotics, but in unprocessed vegetables antibiotics are likely to appear on the dinner table. Constant exposure to antibiotics leads to antibiotic resistance in humans and in bacteria.
Using manure instead of fossil-fuel based fertilizers is common for organic producers, and manure is used to fertilize over 9 million acres of agricultural land in the United States. The study pointed out that manure management is key to keeping antibiotics out of vegetable crops - composting the manure at high temperatures broke almost all of them down.
Via Scientific American |
|
|
Written by Kiki Hubbard
|
|
Wednesday, 28 January 2009 |
|

This just in: The Washington Post reports that Peanut Corporation of America, the company responsible for a salmonella outbreak that has sickened more than 500 people in 43 states, discovered salmonella in internal tests a dozen times in 2007 and 2008 but sold their products anyway.
Ouch.
But this hurts, too: "Companies are not required to disclose their internal tests to either the FDA or state regulators, so health officals did not know of the problem."
Still, FDA officials say that "it appears" Peanut Corp. violated federal law.
The death toll associated with the salmonella contamination has grown to seven. At least one lawsuit has been filed.
The source of the contamination is still unknown, though there's a history of unsanitary conditions at this Georgia plant. The average plant is inspected once every 10 years, but even those inspected more frequently, like this one, prove unsafe when regulations aren't enforced.
It was after the contamination event involving ConAgra's Peter Pan brand that food safety experts found salmonella could "exist in a dormant state in peanut butter and then reproduce when ingested by humans."
FDA has a history of not enforcing regulations and performing enough inspections. Will the new administration heed the call for improvements in the face of avoidable deaths?
Source: Washington Post |
|
|
Written by Erika Fredrickson
|
|
Wednesday, 28 January 2009 |
|

Dairy cows treated with kindness produce more milk. Sound like new age silliness? Not according to the UK's Newcastle University School of Agriculture, Food and Rural Development who recently published their findings in the journal Anthrozoos.
Farmers who name their dairy cows, treat them as individuals and care for them like pets showed an increase of 500 pints per year or 3.4%. The study looked at 516 farms half of which named the cows and paid care and attention to their personalities.
These farmers say that cows do have separate personalities with a range of emotions and should be cared for accordingly--especially for all the milk they give. One farmer said she calls her cows “the ladies.”
BBC News, LiveScience
|
|
|