Last night NPR reported on the Roundup Ready (RR) sugar beet debate. (Click here to listen.) As the planting season approaches, sugar beet producers seem eager to embrace the new variety. "Farmers are going to adopt it as rapidly as they can," says Alan Dexter, weed scientist at North Dakota State University.

While many of these farmers believe Roundup (and other glyphosate herbicides) will replace a variety of toxic herbicides, a report released this week by Friends of the Earth and the Center for Food Safety shows quite the contrary. Applications of herbicides, including 2,4-D (an ingredient in agent orange), have increased significantly in the last five years – as Roundup Ready crop acreage increases. Which is exactly the problem. As more and more glyphosate enters the environment, weeds develop resistance, leaving farmers with more difficult weed challenges that lead to the use of more toxic and expensive chemicals. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency increased glyphosate residue tolerances on sugar beets by 5,000 percent, which only allows this vicious cycle to continue.

Agronomics aside, a comment by American Crystal Sugar's CEO, David Berg, returns me to a question from a previous post: Is the market really there? Berg says that consumer resistance kept the sugar industry from adopting the GE variety until now. "The resistance has just diminished," he says. "People have become more comfortable with it." Have they?

Polls by the Pew Initiative on Food and Biotechnology show that consumer opposition to GE food remains relatively high and knowledge in the issue is low. For example, the Grocery Manufacturers of America estimates that more than 70 percent of processed food probably contains a transgenic ingredient, yet only about a quarter of those polled thought they had eaten GE food before. Is it a lack of consumer resistance or lack of awareness?

Source: NPR

Comments (2)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

trouble
written by Ben, February 17, 2008

So,... I heard NPR's story about GM beets and am still amazed by the lack of informational outreach. Farmers know what is going on, as with the Oregon farmers in the story who voiced concerns about genetic modification and accidental cross-pollination of their own crops. But the consumer is insulated from this information. In a political climate where so much emphasis is placed upon "family and moral values", how can genetically modifying the food we eat escape scrutiny? While we bicker over stem-cell research, how come GM crops are not included in the discussion? This trend continues to concern me.

• 
• +0
• 
• 

gadada
written by masinn, October 30, 2008

ライブãƒ�ャット出会ã�„出会ã�„無料出会ã�„ç
³»å‡ºä¼šã�„　喫茶出会ã�„　カフェ出会ã�„　ãƒ
‘ーティー優良　出会ã�„出会ã�„人妻出会ã�„
掲示æ�¿ãƒ•ã‚£ãƒªãƒ”ンデリヘルãƒ�ャットレデã
‚£ãƒ�ャットレディー出会ã�„テレクラ出会ã�
„系サイト優良出会ã�„系サイトテレクラãƒ�
イク買å�–セフレセックスフレンドä¸�倫出ä
¼šã�„喫茶出会ã�„カフェデリヘルアダルトãƒ
©ã‚¤ãƒ–ãƒ�ャット出会ã�„å±±å�£è»Šè²·å�–転è�·å‡ºä¼š
ã�„出会ã�„ç³»ãƒ�ャットレディー・ãƒ�ャットã
ƒ¬ãƒ‡ã‚£ãƒŽãƒ³ã‚¢ãƒ€ãƒ«ãƒˆãƒ�ャットレディーアãƒ
€ãƒ«ãƒˆãƒ�ャットレディーテレフォンレディ
ーæ�ºå¸¯ãƒ�ャットレディー車買å�–京都ã��ã‚‚ã
�®ä¸�動産出会ã�„長崎ソープランド・・・å¤
©ç„¶ã‚ªãƒªã‚´ç³–在宅仕事爪水虫出会ã�„ç¦�岡出
会ã�„大阪出会ã�„é�’森出会ã�„å±±å�£å‡ºä¼šã�„北ä
¹�州出会ã�„在宅ワーク在宅アルãƒ�イトデãƒ
¼ã‚¿å…¥åŠ›åœ¨å®…翻訳在宅ãƒ�ャットレディ出会
ã�„在宅アルãƒ�イトコレステロール中性脂è
‚ªèŠ±ç²‰ç—‡å†…è�·ä¹¾ç‡¥è‚Œ

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Name

Email

Website

Title

Comment

smaller | bigger

Subscribe via email (Registered users only)

Write the displayed characters

Add Comment