The President-elect's choice of former Governor Tom Vilsack for Secretary of Agriculture has ignited sentiments ranging from delight to dismay, just what you'd expect from a pick who "has the merit of being unsatisfactory to both extremes of the farm-policy debates."

Here at Envirovore we've been digesting a range of views on the Secretary of Ag nominee -- the Secretary of Food, as some advocates keep reminding the nation. This position comes with a host of responsibilities tied to issues that don't automatically register when one hears "agriculture," like nutrition, food stamps, rural development, energy and conservation, to name a few. We know the road ahead will demand the tools of diplomacy and debate. May it also include millions of watchful eyes who are waiting for Obama's administration to see through his ambitious plan for Rural America.

So, here you go. Below the fold is a quick and dirty overview of why Vilsack comes bearing both promise and peril.

Vilsack's experience. Some progressive, well-respected farm and conservation groups praise Tom Vilsack for his experience. National Farmers Union president, Tom Buis (someone I would have picked for the post), said Tom Vilsack understands the economic challenges facing rural America; the League of Conservation Voters cited Vilsack's commitment to renewable energy; and R-CALF said in a press release that it's pleased with Obama's choice, and expects Vilsack to represent the interests of independent U.S. cattle producers.

Other food and farm groups aren't as complimentary, pointing to his support of industrial farming, including an expansion of CAFOs in Iowa, and biotechnology (which Obama actually mentioned in his nomination speech).

As evidence, in 2001 the Biotechnology Industry Organization gave Vilsack a Governor of the Year award, and in 2005, Vilsack supported a pre-emption bill that took away local and state rights to enact stricter regulations on GMOs.

He has, however, said he supports labeling GMOs (which is great, but wrong agency, since the FDA oversees labeling and isn't poised to sway on this issue) and wants to strengthen the approval process for biotech crops. Andrew Kimbrell notes in the Huffington Post that Vilsack also supports biotech firm liability in cases of contamination events and said USDA should require companies to demonstrate no harm to markets for conventional and organic crops before approving new GE varieties.

Conflict of interest? There are two questions regarding integrity that surfaced with Vilsack's nomination, concerns that are likely to have only minor implications for him politically. One, he and his wife have accepted about $42,000 in government farm subsidies through the Conservation Reserve Program. Vilsack has been a staunch supporter of capping subsidy payments, and said he'll forgo subsidy payments to avoid conflict. Two, Vilsack used to work for a lobbying law firm that worked with clients on agribusiness development and energy. According to one watchdog group, this violates Obama's pledge "to bar appointees from working on issues related to their employment for two years." (Sen. Tom Daschle, Obama's pick to head the Department of Health and Human Services, is in the same boat on this last piece.)

The verdict's out. Not surprising, the biggest issue getting the media's attention is Vilsack's support of corn-based ethanol, still a controversial topic. The New York Times published an editorial piece that says Vilsack must take an impartial approach to this issue since he comes from the largest corn-producing state.

The biofuels conversation has now stretched to include a variety of other crops. Will Vilsack heed the call of visionaries Wes Jackson and Wendell Berry and embrace the promise of perennial plants in energy and grain production and soil restoration? So many of these opportunites await in rules yet to be written for the 2008 Farm Bill. This is an extraordinary responsibility to be stepping into.

Vilsack seems to be right on about a few things, like what constitutes fair competition. He supports stronger restrictions on livestock packing plants and wants to end the damaging consequences of vertical integration in the industry, which decreases prices and market access for family farmers. Let's hope he's strong on seed industry concentration, too, where a handful of biotech firms are increasing seed prices unencumbered because there isn't competition to regulate the marketplace.

And he's voiced support for local food systems and accessible health care for farming families -- a serious but oft-forgotten problem that the Center for Rural Affairs is tackling.

In the end, Vilsack is a cautious pick who might not bring as dramatic of change as some progressive farm groups had hoped, especially with biotechnology regulation. Or maybe he will. As John Crabtree at the Center for Rural Affairs writes, "It is difficult, if not impossible, to predict when, where and from whom leadership will emerge." Crabtree thinks Vilsack deserves a chance, and holds a hopeful and "different" view of the nominee, one that can be embraced with equal parts watchfulness after the new administration takes office.

So, let's do our part. Let's keep tabs on our decision-makers and sow seeds of support so we're there to ensure accountability. Whether you like the idea of Vilsack taking the reins of one of the largest agencies or not, we should all put our energy into thoughtful and direct input, and feed the derision to the hogs.

Comments (5)

Subscribe to this comment's feed

wake up!
written by alan, January 13, 2009

so now we have to be optimistic? the only HOPE i see is the hope the election created and is still out there raging in almost every town, but in reality little CHANGE is what we will get from politicians, we people that HOPE, should CHANGE our minds, and get it clear, politicians run for just one party nowadays, the corp business party. 14 out of the top 20 contributors for obama and mccain are the same corps. watch zeitgeist movies!

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Replica Ugg Boots For Sale
written by Replica Ugg Boots For Sale, October 26, 2009

http://www.onlineshopsreviews.com

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Ugg Boots On Sale
written by UGG Classic Mini, December 16, 2009

S11216J2 UGG Bailey Button or not listing, the sale of those UGG Classic Cardy shoes were broken from the factory out of a small amount of code of UGG Classic Mini shoes, if the yardage is complete, it is UGG Classic Tall, it is impossible to thing. See vamps, really UGG very bright and clean, car line is 9 per inch needle, margin is uniform, line moderately elastic, there will be no floating lines, break, jump pin. UGG Ultra Short shoe feel very good, but there is no rupture, breakage. http://www.love-ugg.com/specials.html

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Mr
written by fibny, December 21, 2009

Och fast inget kunde sätta deras, fingra på det, silver earrings var precis en bättre all-around klocka benämner in av samlas vädjan. silver earrings klockor har unmatched särdragnågot liknande att vara riktigt skrapa-resistent och waterproof fullständigt en silver earrings klocka är också berömda för dess kickprecision. Före världen kriga II, silver earrings var ett mer och mer populärt primat vid de långdistans- reklambladen av militären, som berättelsen går. Så de föredrar i hög grad kopiasilver earrings klockor för ett elegantt utseendemässigt. Kopiasilver earrings klockor kommer med 27 en juvel ETA eller 34 juvelförehavanden, eftersom original kommer med 25 juvlar, 27 juvlar ETA eller rörelse för 31 juvel. Således silver earrings för allmänningmanen - den silver earrings kopian - kom in i föreställer. Det är lätt att navigera den, och du har specifikationer för varje av den erbjudna silver earrings kopian att modellera. Prislappen på de silver earrings klockorna gör dem icke tillgängliga till en stor befolkning över världen. Det huvudsakligt resonerar varför du ska väljer kopian silver earrings över den verkliga silver earrings är, naturligtvis de lägre kostar. I faktum, om inte du är ett sakkunnigt, den är tuff att veta som är endast en silver earrings kopia och inte den verkliga silver earrings klockan. Vad som ska sökas efter när köpandekopiasilver earrings klockor. Original- silver earrings är långt - den hållbara stundsilver earrings kopian inte är lång - vara. Dessa är precis spetsar på vad du bör söka efter, om du är minutiös om att välja vilken kopiasilver sterling silver earrings klocka du är det gående köp. Det finns en radda andra kopiaversioner som inte kan följa dessa vägleder, men, som inte betyder, de inte är bra kopior. Om du har tiden, du kan shoppa omkring, så att du kan inhandla den bäst kopian där är ut där. Köpandet som en silver earrings klocka är en spännande uppgift som ha på sig den, ska är även mer spännande, som du förutser hur det ska folket reagerar till ditt flott åtfölja. Så den är värd försöket, i att leka en minutiös köpare. Du har ett primat för store utformar, så bättre välj väl. Den silver earrings kopian Daytona.

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Ugg boots
written by UGG Bailey Button, January 11, 2010

100111SLCN UGG Bailey Button or not listing, the sale of those UGG Classic Cardy shoes were broken from the factory out of a small amount of code of UGG Classic Mini shoes, if the yardage is complete, it is UGG Classic Tall, it is impossible to thing. See vamps, really UGG very bright and clean, car line is 9 per inch needle, margin is uniform, line moderately elastic, there will be no floating lines, break, jump pin. UGG Ultra Short shoe feel very good, but there is no rupture, breakage. http://www.love-ugg.com/products_all.html

• 
• +0
• 
• 

Name

Email

Website

Title

Comment

smaller | bigger

Subscribe via email (Registered users only)

Write the displayed characters

Add Comment